↓ Skip to main content

A new diamond anvil cell for hydrothermal studies to 2.5 GPa and from −190 to 1200 °C

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Scientific Instruments, August 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
333 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new diamond anvil cell for hydrothermal studies to 2.5 GPa and from −190 to 1200 °C
Published in
Review of Scientific Instruments, August 1993
DOI 10.1063/1.1143931
Authors

W. A. Bassett, A. H. Shen, M. Bucknum, I-Ming Chou

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Japan 2 3%
Australia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 69 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 28%
Physics and Astronomy 13 17%
Chemistry 9 12%
Materials Science 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Review of Scientific Instruments
#1,963
of 9,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,895
of 20,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Scientific Instruments
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.