↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
23 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ATLANTIC MAMMAL TRAITS: a data set of morphological traits of mammals in the Atlantic Forest of South America
Published in
Ecology, February 2018
DOI 10.1002/ecy.2106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Gonçalves, Ricardo S. Bovendorp, Gabrielle Beca, Carolina Bello, Raul Costa‐Pereira, Renata L. Muylaert, Raisa R. Rodarte, Nacho Villar, Rafael Souza, Maurício E. Graipel, Jorge J. Cherem, Deborah Faria, Julio Baumgarten, Martín R. Alvarez, Emerson M. Vieira, Nilton Cáceres, Renata Pardini, Yuri L. R. Leite, Leonora P. Costa, Marco A. R. Mello, Erich Fischer, Fernando C. Passos, Luiz H. Varzinczak, Jayme A. Prevedello, Ariovaldo P. Cruz‐Neto, Fernando Carvalho, Alexandre R. Percequillo, Agustin Paviolo, Alessandra Nava, José M. B. Duarte, Noé U. de la Sancha, Enrico Bernard, Ronaldo G. Morato, Juliana F. Ribeiro, Rafael G. Becker, Gabriela Paise, Paulo S. Tomasi, Felipe Vélez‐Garcia, Geruza L. Melo, Jonas Sponchiado, Felipe Cerezer, Marília A. S. Barros, Albérico Q. S. de Souza, Cinthya C. dos Santos, Gastón A. F. Giné, Patricia Kerches‐Rogeri, Marcelo M. Weber, Guilherme Ambar, Lucía V. Cabrera‐Martinez, Alan Eriksson, Maurício Silveira, Carolina F. Santos, Lucas Alves, Eder Barbier, Gabriela C. Rezende, Guilherme S. T. Garbino, Élson O. Rios, Adna Silva, Alexandre Túlio A. Nascimento, Rodrigo S. de Carvalho, Anderson Feijó, Juan Arrabal, Ilaria Agostini, Daniela Lamattina, Sebastian Costa, Ezequiel Vanderhoeven, Fabiano R. de Melo, Plautino de Oliveira Laroque, Leandro Jerusalinsky, Mônica M. Valença‐Montenegro, Amely B. Martins, Gabriela Ludwig, Renata B. de Azevedo, Agustin Anzóategui, Marina X. da Silva, Marcela Figuerêdo Duarte Moraes, Alexandre Vogliotti, Andressa Gatti, Thomas Püttker, Camila S. Barros, Thais K. Martins, Alexine Keuroghlian, Donald P. Eaton, Carolina L. Neves, Marcelo S. Nardi, Caryne Braga, Pablo R. Gonçalves, Ana Carolina Srbek‐Araujo, Poliana Mendes, João A. de Oliveira, Fábio A. M. Soares, Patrício A. Rocha, Peter Crawshaw, Milton C. Ribeiro, Mauro Galetti

Abstract

Measures of traits are the basis of functional biological diversity. Numerous works consider mean species-level measures of traits while ignoring individual variance within species. However, there is a large amount of variation within species and it is increasingly apparent that it is important to consider trait variation not only between species, but also within species. Mammals are an interesting group for investigating trait-based approaches because they play diverse and important ecological functions (e.g., pollination, seed dispersal, predation, grazing) that are correlated with functional traits. Here we compile a data set comprising morphological and life history information of 279 mammal species from 39,850 individuals of 388 populations ranging from -5.83 to -29.75 decimal degrees of latitude and -34.82 to -56.73 decimal degrees of longitude in the Atlantic forest of South America. We present trait information from 16,840 individuals of 181 species of non-volant mammals (Rodentia, Didelphimorphia, Carnivora, Primates, Cingulata, Artiodactyla, Pilosa, Lagomorpha, Perissodactyla) and from 23,010 individuals of 98 species of volant mammals (Chiroptera). The traits reported include body mass, age, sex, reproductive stage, as well as the geographic coordinates of sampling for all taxa. Moreover, we gathered information on forearm length for bats and body length and tail length for rodents and marsupials. No copyright restrictions are associated with the use of this data set. Please cite this data paper when the data are used in publications. We also request that researchers and teachers inform us of how they are using the data.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 242 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 9%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 48 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 43%
Environmental Science 48 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 60 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#961,129
of 30,526,325 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#362
of 7,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,384
of 465,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#9
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,526,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.