Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a local, progressive dilation of the distal aorta that risks rupture until treated. Using the law of Laplace, in vivo assessment of AAA surface geometry could identify regions of high wall tensions as well as provide critical dimensional and shape data for customized endoluminal stent grafts. In this study, six patients with AAA underwent spiral computed tomography imaging and the inner wall of each AAA was identified, digitized, and reconstructed. A biquadric surface patch technique was used to compute the local principal curvatures, which required no assumptions regarding axisymmetry or other shape characteristics of the AAA surface. The spatial distribution of AAA principal curvatures demonstrated substantial axial asymmetry, and included adjacent elliptical and hyperbolic regions. To determine how much the curvature spatial distributions were dependent on tortuosity versus bulging, the effects of AAA tortuosity were removed from the three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions by aligning the centroids of each digitized contour to the z axis. The spatial distribution of principal curvatures of the modified 3D reconstructions were found to be largely axisymmetric, suggesting that much of the surface geometric asymmetry is due to AAA bending. On average, AAA surface area increased by 56% and abdominal aortic length increased by 27% over those for the normal aorta. Our results indicate that AAA surface geometry is highly complex and cannot be simulated by simple axisymmetric models, and suggests an equally complex wall stress distribution.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,087,116
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#447
of 2,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,641
of 39,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them
