↓ Skip to main content

Learning your way around town: How virtual taxicab drivers learn to use both layout and landmark information

Overview of attention for article published in Cognition, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Learning your way around town: How virtual taxicab drivers learn to use both layout and landmark information
Published in
Cognition, August 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

By having subjects drive a virtual taxicab through a computer-rendered town, we examined how landmark and layout information interact during spatial navigation. Subject-drivers searched for passengers, and then attempted to take the most efficient route to the requested destinations (one of several target stores). Experiment 1 demonstrated that subjects rapidly learn to find direct paths from random pickup locations to target stores. Experiment 2 varied the degree to which landmark and layout cues were preserved across two successively learned towns. When spatial layout was preserved, transfer was low if only target stores were altered, and high if both target stores and surrounding buildings were altered, even though in the latter case all local views were changed. This suggests that subjects can rapidly acquire a survey representation based on the spatial layout of the town and independent of local views, but that subjects will rely on local views when present, and are harmed when associations between previously learned landmarks are disrupted. We propose that spatial navigation reflects a hierarchical system in which either layout or landmark information is sufficient for orienting and wayfinding; however, when these types of cues conflict, landmarks are preferentially used.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
France 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 173 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 21%
Researcher 40 21%
Student > Master 30 16%
Professor 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 34%
Computer Science 26 13%
Neuroscience 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 37 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2025.
All research outputs
#6,087,116
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Cognition
#1,472
of 3,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,075
of 99,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.