↓ Skip to main content

Normal phase liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry analysis of phospholipid molecular species in blood mononuclear cells: application to cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Normal phase liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry analysis of phospholipid molecular species in blood mononuclear cells: application to cystic fibrosis
Published in
Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences, October 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.07.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The use of HPLC coupled on-line with a mass spectrometer is a very powerful tool in order to analyze intact PLs molecular species (PMS) without the need of derivatization, thus decreasing the risk of artifacts formation. A normal-phase HPLC-ESI-MS-MS method has been developed in order to study the human blood mononuclear cell PMS composition. This method was applied to characterize PMS from seven CF subjects and from seven age-matched healthy subjects. More than 140 phospholipid molecular species from phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), plasmalogen phosphatidylethanolamine (pPE), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylcholine (PC) and sphingomyelin (Sph) were identified and compared. Differences between the two groups were found in pPE (p16:0/22:6), pPE (p18:0/22:6), PE (16:0/20:4) and PC (16:0/18:2) which were significantly lower in CF subjects and in PC (16:0/16:1) which was significantly higher in CF subjects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Russia 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Professor 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2011.
All research outputs
#12,343,970
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences
#1,681
of 5,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,974
of 106,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences
#20
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,671 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.