↓ Skip to main content

The effect of different organic solvents on sodium ion storage in carbon nanopores

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP), January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effect of different organic solvents on sodium ion storage in carbon nanopores
Published in
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP), January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c7cp04878e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In this study fully atomistic grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations have been employed to study the behaviour of an electrolyte salt (NaPF6) and different non-aqueous (organic) solvents in carbon nanopores, to reveal the structure and storage mechanism. Organic solutions of Na+ and PF6- ions at 1 M concentration were considered, based on the conditions in operational sodium ion batteries and supercapacitors. Three organic solvents with different properties were selected: ethylene carbonate (EC), propylene carbonate (PC), and ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC). The effects of solvents, pore size and surface charge were quantified by calculating the radial distribution functions and ionic density profiles. It is shown that the organic solvent properties and nanopore confinement can affect the structure of the organic electrolyte solution. For the pore size range (1-5 nm) investigated in this paper, the surface charge used in this study can alter the sodium ions but not the solvent structure inside the pore.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 17%
Engineering 3 13%
Chemical Engineering 2 8%
Materials Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#11,471,843
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP)
#3,867
of 21,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,389
of 496,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP)
#222
of 1,850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,054 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.