↓ Skip to main content

Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessment using a new mathematical model

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessment using a new mathematical model
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, September 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02684226
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Knowledge of the biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) as compared to nonaneurysmal aorta may provide information on the natural history of this disease. We have performed uniaxial tensile testing of excised human aneurysmal and nonaneurysmal abdominal aortic specimens. A new mathematical model that conforms to the fibrous structure of the vascular tissue was used to quantify the measured elastic response. We determined for each specimen the yield (sigma y) and ultimate (sigma u) strengths, the separate contribution to total tissue stiffness by elastin (EE) and collagen (EC) fibers, and a collagen recruitment parameter (A), which is a measure of the tortuosity of the collagen fibers. There was no significant difference in any of these mechanical properties between longitudinal and circumferential AAA specimens, nor in EE and EC between longitudinally oriented aneurysmal and normal specimens. A, sigma y, and sigma u were all significantly higher for the normal than for the aneurysmal group: A = 0.223 +/- 0.046 versus A = 0.091 +/- 0.009 (mean +/- SEM; p < 0.0005), sigma y = 121.0 +/- 32.8 N/cm2 versus sigma y = 65.2 +/- 9.5 N/cm2 (p < 0.05), and sigma u = 201.4 +/- 39.4 N/cm2 versus sigma u = 86.4 +/- 10.2 N/cm2 (p < 0.0005), respectively. Our findings suggest that the AAA tissue is isotropic with respect to these mechanical properties. The observed difference in A between aneurysmal and normal aorta may be due to the complete recruitment and loading of collagen fibers at lower extensions in the former. Our data indicate that AAA rupture may be related to a reduction in tensile strength and that the biomechanical properties of AAA should be considered in assessing the severity of an individual aneurysm.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 195 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 25%
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 100 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Materials Science 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 55 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2017.
All research outputs
#5,621,379
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,998
of 28,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them