↓ Skip to main content

Classification des vascularites systémiques

Overview of attention for article published in La Presse Médicale (ScienceDirect), April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Classification des vascularites systémiques
Published in
La Presse Médicale (ScienceDirect), April 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.lpm.2007.01.035
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Vasculitides are defined by inflammation of blood vessel walls leading to vascular stenosis or occlusion, with various degrees of fibrinoid necrosis of the media and inflammatory infiltration, mainly neutrophilic and sometimes granulomatous. Various classifications of the vasculitides have been proposed. The classifications used most today are the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification and the Chapel Hill nomenclature, published in 1994 . Only the latter distinguished between polyarteritis nodosa and microscopic polyangiitis and stressed the importance of antineutrophil cytoplasm autoantibodies (ANCA). In practice, primary systemic vasculitides are classified according to their clinical presentations, their precise histological features, and the size of the predominantly affected vessels. Some small-vessel vasculitides are associated with the presence of ANCA: 90% of patients with systemic Wegener's granulomatosis (mainly ANCA with cytoplasm labeling on indirect immunofluorescence and proteinase 3 specificity), 80% of the subjects with microscopic polyangiitis (mostly pANCA with myeloperoxidase specificity), and more than one third of those with Churg-Strauss syndrome (mostly pANCA).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2016.
All research outputs
#12,343,970
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from La Presse Médicale (ScienceDirect)
#346
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,653
of 131,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from La Presse Médicale (ScienceDirect)
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.