↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional Supplementation in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies: Impact on Twin–Twin Transfusion Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Perinatology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nutritional Supplementation in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies: Impact on Twin–Twin Transfusion Syndrome
Published in
American Journal of Perinatology, October 2008
DOI 10.1055/s-0028-1091400
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) has been related to unbalanced unidirectional arteriovenous anastomoses in the placenta of monochorionic diamniotic (DiMo) twin gestations. As maternal malnutrition accounting for hypoproteinemia and anemia has been detected in severe cases of TTTS, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of early diet supplementation on TTTS. Fifty-one DiMo twin pregnancies were given commercially available oral nutritional diet supplements and then compared in a retrospective cohort study to 52 twin gestations with the same chorionicity but not subjected to nutritional supplementation. Diet supplementation was associated with lower overall incidence of TTTS (20/52 versus 8/51, P = 0.02) and with lower prevalence of TTTS at delivery (18/52 versus 6/51, P = 0.012) when compared with no supplementation. Nutritional intervention also significantly prolonged the time between the diagnosis of TTTS and delivery (9.4 +/- 3.7 weeks versus 4.6 +/- 6.5 weeks; P = 0.014). The earlier nutritional regimen was introduced, the lesser chance of detecting TTTS ( P = 0.001). Although not statistically significant, dietary intervention was also associated with lower Quintero stage, fewer invasive treatments, and lower twin birth weight discordance. Diet supplementation appears to counter maternal metabolic abnormalities in DiMo twin pregnancies and improve perinatal outcomes in TTTS when combined with the standard therapeutic options.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 6%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#12,436,002
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Perinatology
#1,375
of 3,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,588
of 147,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Perinatology
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.