↓ Skip to main content

IC14, a CD14 specific monoclonal antibody, is a potential treatment for patients with severe sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Innate Immunity, August 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 607)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
20 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
IC14, a CD14 specific monoclonal antibody, is a potential treatment for patients with severe sepsis
Published in
Innate Immunity, August 2001
DOI 10.1177/09680519010070040201
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

CD14 is a pattern recognition receptor for the bacterial cell wall components from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as mycobacteria. Binding of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or other cell wall constituents to CD14 initiates signal transduction through the Toll-like receptors resulting in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the initiation of the systemic inflammatory response. In rabbits and non-human primates, CD14 specific antibodies were shown to attenuate responses to LPS or Escherichia coli challenge including pro-inflammatory cytokine release, acute lung injury, hypotension and changes in lung, liver, spleen and adrenal gland morphology. In healthy human subjects, single doses of a chimeric CD14 antibody (IC14) have been shown to be well tolerated and result in a dose-related degree of saturation of CD14 receptors on monocytes and granulocytes. Pretreatment of healthy subjects with IC14 2 h prior to LPS resulted in an attenuation of the LPS-induced fever, clinical symptoms, and leukocyte activation and degranulation. IC14 inhibited the release of TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-10 and delayed the release of sTNFR(I) and IL-1ra. Further studies are in progress to characterize the safety and clinical pharmacology of IC14 in patients with severe sepsis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2026.
All research outputs
#3,713,197
of 33,945,077 outputs
Outputs from Innate Immunity
#17
of 607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,808
of 59,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Innate Immunity
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,945,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them