↓ Skip to main content

An enhanced genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Streptomyces clavuligerus identifies novel strain improvement strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An enhanced genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Streptomyces clavuligerus identifies novel strain improvement strategies
Published in
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00449-018-1900-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In this work, we expanded and updated a genome-scale metabolic model of Streptomyces clavuligerus. The model includes 1021 genes and 1494 biochemical reactions; genome-reaction information was curated and new features related to clavam metabolism and to the biomass synthesis equation were incorporated. The model was validated using experimental data from the literature and simulations were performed to predict cellular growth and clavulanic acid biosynthesis. Flux balance analysis (FBA) showed that limiting concentrations of phosphate and an excess of ammonia accumulation are unfavorable for growth and clavulanic acid biosynthesis. The evaluation of different objective functions for FBA showed that maximization of ATP yields the best predictions for cellular behavior in continuous cultures, while the maximization of growth rate provides better predictions for batch cultures. Through gene essentiality analysis, 130 essential genes were found using a limited in silico media, while 100 essential genes were identified in amino acid-supplemented media. Finally, a strain design was carried out to identify candidate genes to be overexpressed or knocked out so as to maximize antibiotic biosynthesis. Interestingly, potential metabolic engineering targets, identified in this study, have not been tested experimentally.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 26%
Engineering 8 12%
Chemical Engineering 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#9,147,366
of 33,729,289 outputs
Outputs from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#288
of 1,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,497
of 487,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,729,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.