↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Mammalian Circadian Behavior by Non-rod, Non-cone, Ocular Photoreceptors

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
525 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regulation of Mammalian Circadian Behavior by Non-rod, Non-cone, Ocular Photoreceptors
Published in
Science, April 1999
DOI 10.1126/science.284.5413.502
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Circadian rhythms of mammals are entrained by light to follow the daily solar cycle (photoentrainment). To determine whether retinal rods and cones are required for this response, the effects of light on the regulation of circadian wheel-running behavior were examined in mice lacking these photoreceptors. Mice without cones (cl) or without both rods and cones (rdta/cl) showed unattenuated phase-shifting responses to light. Removal of the eyes abolishes this behavior. Thus, neither rods nor cones are required for photoentrainment, and the murine eye contains additional photoreceptors that regulate the circadian clock.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 525 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 496 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 114 22%
Student > Bachelor 97 18%
Researcher 55 10%
Student > Master 49 9%
Professor 24 5%
Other 94 18%
Unknown 92 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142 27%
Neuroscience 84 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 9%
Psychology 29 6%
Other 62 12%
Unknown 107 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,420,373
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Science
#23,131
of 93,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#550
of 39,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#21
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.