↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using Population Viability Analysis to Develop Recovery Criteria for Endangered Insects: Case Study of the Fender's Blue Butterfly
Published in
Conservation Biology, September 2003
DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02141.x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Brazil 7 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 184 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 16%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 14 7%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 26 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 56%
Environmental Science 54 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 31 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,437,646
of 29,116,173 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,700
of 4,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,135
of 65,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,116,173 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.