↓ Skip to main content

Effect of electrical stimulation on chronic wound healing: a meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Wound Repair & Regeneration, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
7 patents
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of electrical stimulation on chronic wound healing: a meta‐analysis
Published in
Wound Repair & Regeneration, January 2002
DOI 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00495.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sue E. Gardner, Rita A. Frantz, Frank L. Schmidt

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 27%
Engineering 14 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Materials Science 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2025.
All research outputs
#2,332,630
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Wound Repair & Regeneration
#69
of 1,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,481
of 182,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wound Repair & Regeneration
#3
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.