↓ Skip to main content

Blood Lead Concentrations of Children in the United States: A Comparison of States Using Two Very Large Databases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatrics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Blood Lead Concentrations of Children in the United States: A Comparison of States Using Two Very Large Databases
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.01.059
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine whether there are substantial differences by state between 2 large population-based datasets in the proportion of children with elevated blood lead levels (BLLs); to identify states in which the percentage of elevated BLLs is high in either or both datasets; and to compare the percentage of elevated BLLs in individual states with those of children living in Flint, Michigan, during the months when these children were exposed to lead-contaminated drinking water. Tables of BLLs for individual states from the Quest Diagnostics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention datasets for 2014-2015, containing more than 3 million BLLs of young children < 6 years old, were constructed to compare the Quest Diagnostics and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data with one another and with BLLs available for Flint children for 2014-2015. For some states, the percentages of BLLs ≥5.0 µg/dL are similar in the 2 datasets, whereas for other states, the datasets differ substantially in the percentage of BLLs ≥5.0 µg/dL. The percentage of BLLs ≥5.0 µg/dL is greater in some states in both datasets than observed in Flint when children were exposed to contaminated water. The data presented in this study can be a resource for pediatricians and public health professionals involved in the design of state programs to reduce lead exposure (primary prevention) and identify children with elevated BLLs (secondary prevention).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Engineering 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,058,019
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#1,083
of 15,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,161
of 352,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#25
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.