↓ Skip to main content

Neurogenin and NeuroD direct transcriptional targets and their regulatory enhancers

Overview of attention for article published in EMBO Journal, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neurogenin and NeuroD direct transcriptional targets and their regulatory enhancers
Published in
EMBO Journal, November 2007
DOI 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601923
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Proneural basic helix-loop-helix proteins are key regulators of neurogenesis but their 'proneural' function is not well understood, partly because primary targets have not been systematically defined. Here, we identified direct transcriptional targets of the bHLH proteins Neurogenin and NeuroD and found that primary roles of these transcription factors are to induce regulators of transcription, signal transduction, and cytoskeletal rearrangement for neuronal differentiation and migration. We determined targets induced in both Xenopus and mouse, which represent evolutionarily conserved core mediators of Neurogenin and NeuroD activities. We defined consensus sequences for Neurogenin and NeuroD binding and identified responsive enhancers in seven shared target genes. These enhancers commonly contained clustered, conserved consensus-binding sites and drove neural-restricted transgene expression in Xenopus embryos. We then used this enhancer signature in a genome-wide computational approach to predict additional Neurogenin/NeuroD target genes involved in neurogenesis. Taken together, these data demonstrate that Neurogenin and NeuroD preferentially recognize neurogenesis-related targets through an enhancer signature of clustered consensus-binding sites and regulate neurogenesis by activating a core set of transcription factors, which build a robust network controlling neurogenesis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
United States 4 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 189 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 25%
Researcher 39 20%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 34 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 20%
Neuroscience 20 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 41 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#12,343,160
of 34,357,314 outputs
Outputs from EMBO Journal
#8,959
of 14,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,132
of 123,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EMBO Journal
#30
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.