↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Insoluble γ-Tubulin–Containing Structures Are Anchored to the Apical Network of Intermediate Filaments in Polarized Caco-2 Epithelial Cells
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, August 1999
DOI 10.1083/jcb.146.3.645
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have previously shown that a thin ( approximately 1 microm) layer of intermediate filaments located beneath the apical membrane of a variety of simple epithelial cells participates in the organization of apical microfilaments and microtubules. Here, I confirmed the apical distribution of gamma-tubulin-containing structures (potential microtubule-organizing centers) in CACO-2 cells and demonstrated perfect colocalization of centrosomes and nearly 50% of noncentrosomal gamma-tubulin with apical intermediate filaments, but not with apical F-actin. Furthermore, the antisense-oligonucleotide-mediated downregulation of cytokeratin 19, using two different antisense sequences, was more efficient than anticytoskeletal agents to delocalize centrosomes. Electron microscopy colocalization suggests that binding occurs at the outer boundary of the pericentriolar material. Type I cytokeratins 18 and 19 present in these cells specifically coimmunoprecipitated in multi-protein fragments of the cytoskeleton with gamma-tubulin. The size and shape of the fragments, visualized at the EM level, indicate that physical trapping is an unlikely explanation for this result. Drastic changes in the extraction protocol did not affect coimmunoprecipitation. These results from three independent techniques, indicate that insoluble gamma-tubulin-containing structures are attached to apical intermediate filaments.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Researcher 8 20%
Other 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 20%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2008.
All research outputs
#12,344,283
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#8,311
of 13,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,063
of 51,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#38
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.