↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for Genetic Linkage of Alzheimer's Disease to Chromosome 10q

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
32 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evidence for Genetic Linkage of Alzheimer's Disease to Chromosome 10q
Published in
Science, December 2000
DOI 10.1126/science.290.5500.2302
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent studies suggest that insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) in neurons and microglia degrades Abeta, the principal component of beta-amyloid and one of the neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We performed parametric and nonparametric linkage analyses of seven genetic markers on chromosome 10q, six of which map near the IDE gene, in 435 multiplex AD families. These analyses revealed significant evidence of linkage for adjacent markers (D10S1671, D10S583, D10S1710, and D10S566), which was most pronounced in late-onset families. Furthermore, we found evidence for allele-specific association between the putative disease locus and marker D10S583, which has recently been located within 195 kilobases of the IDE gene.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Professor 15 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 19%
Neuroscience 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,670,958
of 33,666,858 outputs
Outputs from Science
#37,973
of 93,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,344
of 158,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#86
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,666,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.