↓ Skip to main content

The impact of prior risk experiences on subsequent risky decision-making: The role of the insula

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The impact of prior risk experiences on subsequent risky decision-making: The role of the insula
Published in
NeuroImage, January 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.097
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Risky decision-making is significantly affected by homeostatic states associated with different prior risk experiences, yet the neural mechanisms have not been well understood. Using functional MRI, we examined how gambling decisions and their underlying neural responses were modulated by prior risk experiences, with a focus on the insular cortex since it has been implicated in interoception, emotion and risky decision-making. Fourteen healthy young participants were scanned while performing a gambling task that was designed to simulate daily-life risk taking. Prior risk experience was manipulated by presenting participants with gambles that they were very likely to accept or gambles that they were unlikely to accept. A probe gamble, which was sensitive to individual's risk preference, was presented to examine the effect of prior risk experiences (Risk vs. Norisk) on subsequent risky decisions. Compared to passing on a gamble (Norisk), taking a gamble, especially winning a gamble (Riskwin), was associated with significantly stronger activation in the insular and dorsal medial prefrontal cortices. Decision making after Norisk was more risky and more likely to recruit activation of the insular and anterior cingulate cortices. This insular activity during decision making predicted the extent of risky decisions both within- and across-subjects, and was also correlated with an individual's personality trait of urgency. These findings suggest that the insula plays an important role in activating representations of homeostatic states associated with the experience of risk, which in turn exerts an influence on subsequent decisions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 12 4%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 306 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 27%
Researcher 52 16%
Student > Master 37 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 60 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 128 39%
Neuroscience 43 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Engineering 10 3%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 77 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#6,257
of 12,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,474
of 173,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#59
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.