↓ Skip to main content

Heterogeneity in Self-Assessed Health Status Among the Elderly in India

Overview of attention for article published in Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Heterogeneity in Self-Assessed Health Status Among the Elderly in India
Published in
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, September 2011
DOI 10.1177/1010539511416109
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The authors examine the observed heterogeneity in self-assessed health (SAH) among the aged in India using data on health and living conditions of the elderly in India from the 60th Round of National Sample Survey (2004-2005). Results indicate that almost one fourth of the old in India rate their health as poor, and there exists considerable interstate variations in SAH ratings. Based on hypotheses framed on the basis of preliminary evidence, the article uses ordered probit models to find that probabilities of reporting poor health are increasingly clustered and more likely among the poor, single, lower-educated, and economically inactive groups among the elderly, with those states with a higher proportion of older people reporting poor subjective health status. Physical mobility appears to have a strong and direct bearing on SAH. The authors also identify unobserved heterogeneity among the states and also among the health rating categories.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Psychology 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2026.
All research outputs
#12,358,651
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
#269
of 894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,224
of 174,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 894 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.