↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

BLOOD GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS (A ): Plea for Uniformity.

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 1940
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
BLOOD GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS (A ): Plea for Uniformity.
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 1940
Pubmed ID
Authors

I H Erb

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,375,394
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4,372
of 9,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them