↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of anterior screw fixation in children: a tomographic study

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Feasibility of anterior screw fixation in children: a tomographic study
Published in
European Spine Journal, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5504-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Morphology measures of the odontoid process in children under 12 years old were carried out to demonstrate the viability of anterior internal fixation in this population once their active profile may not be compatible with successful conservative treatment. During a 6-month period, 36 tomographic examinations of the cervical spine region that provided visualization of the odontoid process were selected. Group 1 included children between 6 and 9 years of age, and group 2 contained children from 9 to 12 years of age. There were 23 (63.8%) male patients and 13 (36.2%) female patients. Patients diagnosed with a tumor, an infection, fracture non-union, or congenital malformation were excluded. Exams were ordered as part of a protocol applied to non-specific neck pain and pediatric trauma entries. The following parameters were analyzed: (1) screw attack angle, (2) height of the odontoid process, and (3) minimal transverse diameter of the odontoid process. In Groups 1 and 2, the average values of the screw attack angle were 55.9° ± 2.3° and 54.8° ± 4.5°, respectively; the average heights of the odontoid process were 26.58 ± 3.28 and 29.48 ± 3 mm, respectively, and the average minimal transverse diameter of the odontoid process were 6.57 ± 1.08 and 6.23 ± 0.88 mm, respectively. The minimal transverse diameter of the odontoid process was statistically higher in males than that in females, regardless of age (p = 0.007). In both groups, the minimal transverse diameter of the odontoid process allowed for the use of one 3.5-4.5 mm screw for anterior internal fixation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 63%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Unknown 10 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2020.
All research outputs
#9,545,624
of 28,775,965 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,148
of 5,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,347
of 461,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#20
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,775,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.