↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Effects of Therapy With Captopril and Digoxin in Patients With Mild to Moderate Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
10 patents
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparative Effects of Therapy With Captopril and Digoxin in Patients With Mild to Moderate Heart Failure
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 1988
DOI 10.1001/jama.1988.03720040031022
Authors

Jay Cohn, Morton Hawkins, Herbert Levine, John Naughton, Elliot Rapaport, Sidney Goldstein, Bertram Pitt, Robert Cody, Prakash Deedwania, Leonard Dennick, Joseph Franciosa, Mark McGovern, Joseph Meyer, Alan Gradman, Barry Massie, Milton Packer, James Doherty, Jacquelyn Gammill, William Cooper, Stanford Engel, Rita Fand, Barbara Hallows, Linda Kerwin, Debra A. Soltesz, John O. Parker, Karen Lahey, Prakash C. Deedwania, Enrique Carbajal, Pat Watson, Robert DiBianco, James A. Ronan, Dennis J. Donohue, Keith M. Lindgren, Louis J. Larca, Judy Freitag, Donna Lindemuth, Jeffrey B. Lakier, Howard S. Rosman, Mary Beth Wlodkowski, Robert J. Cody, Spencer H. Kubo, Mary Clark, Katie Pondolfino, Joseph A. Franciosa, Mary Wilen, Drexel Jordan, Sunil K. Das, John M. Nicklas, Mary Kay Foley, Michael B. Higginbotham, Frederick R. Cobb, Jean Wilson, David M. Berkson, Dragic Obradovic, Patricia Hershinow, N. Gary Nicholls, Hamid Ikram, Ian Crozier, Carl J. Pepine, John Culp, Marion Limacher, Kathy Mulvehill-Verbust, D. John Farnham, Dorothy Adams, Norene Streicher, Carol Shanley, Mark A. Greenberg, Janet Strain, Mary Hewitt, Barbara Levine, D. Norman Sharpe, Robin Briant, Rene Coxon, Barry M. Massie, James W. Cornyn, Nina Topic, Harold Willens, Denise Antonishen, Dorothy Reinstein, Harry Colfer, Karen E. Graham, Gerald M. Perlow, Harvey S. Zarren, Barbara Bent, Marjorie Zicherman, Barry Zaret, Deborah Lawrason, Pat Tellier, Kathy O'Keefe, Syed Mohiuddin, Lois Stengel, James D. Madison, Nancy Carruthers, Fernando Elijovich, Mary O'Sullivan, Uri Elkayam, Shabudin H. Rahimtoola, Laura Weber, Sheldon Gottlieb, Carol Brown, Mariell D. Jessup, Susan Ulrich, Jane Kronenthal, Denise Capaccio, Colin Grant, Edward Gillie, Pat Wood, Fetnat M. Fouad-Tarazi, Kay Petey

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Mathematics 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,513,791
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#15,235
of 42,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#973
of 70,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.