↓ Skip to main content

Rad Hard Active Media For Calorimeters

Overview of attention for article published in AIP Conference Proceedings, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rad Hard Active Media For Calorimeters
Published in
AIP Conference Proceedings, October 2006
DOI 10.1063/1.2396941
Authors

E. Norbeck, J. E. Olson, A. Moeller, Y. Onel

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2025.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from AIP Conference Proceedings
#839
of 8,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,297
of 86,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIP Conference Proceedings
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.