↓ Skip to main content

Replication-competent human mitochondrial DNA lacking the heavy-strand promoter region.

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular & Cellular Biology, March 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Replication-competent human mitochondrial DNA lacking the heavy-strand promoter region.
Published in
Molecular & Cellular Biology, March 1991
DOI 10.1128/mcb.11.3.1631
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We identified two patients with progressive external ophthalmoplegia, a mitochondrial disease, who harbored a population of partially deleted mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) with unusual properties. These molecules were deleted from mtDNA positions 548 to 4,442 and encompassed not only rRNA sequences but the heavy-strand promoter region as well. A 13-bp direct repeat was found flanking the breakpoint precisely, with the repeat at positions 535 to 547 located within the binding site for mitochondrial transcription factor 1 (mtTF1). This is the second mtDNA deletion involving a 13-bp direct repeat reported but is at least 10 times less frequent in the patient population than the former one. In situ hybridization studies showed that transcripts under the control of the light-strand promoter were abundant in muscle fibers with abnormal proliferation of mitochondria, while transcripts directed by the heavy-strand promoter, whether of genes residing inside or outside the deleted region, were not. The efficient transcription from the light-strand promoter implies that the major heavy-and light-strand promoters, although physically close, are functionally independent, confirming previous in vitro studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 5%
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2026.
All research outputs
#12,354,983
of 34,394,870 outputs
Outputs from Molecular & Cellular Biology
#6,620
of 14,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,363
of 24,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular & Cellular Biology
#51
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,394,870 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.