↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Murine Smooth Muscle Cells Generated from Embryonic versus Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cells & Development, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Comparison of Murine Smooth Muscle Cells Generated from Embryonic versus Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Published in
Stem Cells & Development, September 2008
DOI 10.1089/scd.2008.0179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Professor 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Engineering 4 5%
Chemical Engineering 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,512,091
of 34,151,039 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cells & Development
#590
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,860
of 138,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cells & Development
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,151,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.