@Bean883397 @DipshikhaGhosh https://t.co/vCPFWFpYOT 1-2% increase in probability of abnormalities using IVF, meaning an over 94% success rate resulting in perfectly healthy children that wouldn’t get to live otherwise. Note, this is not using spermbots,…
@Bean883397 @BurnettWrites @DipshikhaGhosh https://t.co/YlGc8Etsme 1-2% increase in probability of abnormalities using IVF, meaning an over 94% success rate resulting in perfectly healthy children that wouldn’t get to live otherwise. Note, this is not u…
@Italian347 well I don't know if you're counting minor birth defects, but I checked and it seems that IVF-conceived children only have a major birth defect around 6.2% of the times (that figure is 4.4% naturally conceived children) https://t.co/YZMNeS9…
@larisasomething @RichardHanania It's not about qty (healthy or otherwise) at all. The question was direct, is a 0.5% (https://t.co/4xRRGXcClm) increase in risk is worth scrapping a population's individual reproductive rights for?