↓ Skip to main content

Tear Film Changes Associated with Normal Aging

Overview of attention for article published in Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, May 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
85 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tear Film Changes Associated with Normal Aging
Published in
Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, May 1996
DOI 10.1097/00003226-199605000-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We examined a group of normal subjects to evaluate the tear film function by measuring reflex tear capacity using the Schirmer test without anesthetic, steady state tear flow using fluorophotometry, meibomian gland function based on gland drop-out, expressible lipid volume and viscosity, tear loss from evaporation, and tear osmolarity. We found the average tear flow to be 0.19 +/- 0.19 microliters/min, lower than previously measured. The average tear volume was also correspondingly less, 2.74 +/- 2.0 microliters. We found there was a decline associated with advancing age for all parameters except the decay constant and lipid volume. The highest correlations with aging were tear volume (-0.64), Schirmer test (-0.63), and tear osmolarity (0.59). Our results indicate that there is a decline in tear film function throughout life and that tear flow is considerably less than previously estimated.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 26 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 28 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2026.
All research outputs
#3,778,495
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#170
of 4,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,426
of 39,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.