↓ Skip to main content

Source of Pseudomonas cepacia: Ribotyping of isolates from patients and from the environment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatrics, November 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Source of Pseudomonas cepacia: Ribotyping of isolates from patients and from the environment
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, November 1993
DOI 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80851-0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ribotyping, an analysis of bacterial strain identity based on chromosomal restriction fragment length polymorphisms, was performed on 68 isolates of Pseudomonas cepacia recovered from patients receiving care at the two children's hospitals in Philadelphia and from environmental samples. Twenty different ribotypes were identified. Ribotype R3 predominated among isolates from all three sources. These findings are consistent with the acquisition of P. cepacia from the environment or by person-to-person transmission.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 40%
Professor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,581,873
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#4,964
of 15,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,759
of 29,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#16
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.