↓ Skip to main content

Uncovering of Functional Alternative CTLA-4 Counter-Receptor in B7-Deficient Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
96 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Uncovering of Functional Alternative CTLA-4 Counter-Receptor in B7-Deficient Mice
Published in
Science, November 1993
DOI 10.1126/science.7694362
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

B7 delivers a costimulatory signal through CD28, resulting in interleukin-2 secretion and T cell proliferation. Blockade of this pathway results in T cell anergy. The in vivo role of B7 was evaluated with B7-deficient mice. These mice had a 70 percent decrease in costimulation of the response to alloantigen. Despite lacking B7 expression, activated B cells from these mice bound CTLA-4 and GL1 monoclonal antibody, demonstrating that alternative CTLA-4 ligand or ligands exist. These receptors are functionally important because the residual allogenic mixed lymphocyte responses were blocked by CTLA4Ig. Characterization of these CTLA-4 ligands should lead to strategies for manipulating the immune response.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Singapore 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Professor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2026.
All research outputs
#2,401,942
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Science
#31,240
of 93,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#733
of 29,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#22
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.