↓ Skip to main content

Intermolecular Forces and Energies Between Ligands and Receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
20 patents
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intermolecular Forces and Energies Between Ligands and Receptors
Published in
Science, October 1994
DOI 10.1126/science.7939660
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The recognition mechanisms and dissociation pathways of the avidin-biotin complex and of actin monomers in actin filaments were investigated. The unbinding forces of discrete complexes of avidin or streptavidin with biotin analogs are proportional to the enthalpy change of the complex formation but independent of changes in the free energy. This result indicates that the unbinding process is adiabatic and that entropic changes occur after unbinding. On the basis of the measured forces and binding energies, an effective rupture length of 9.5 +/- 1 angstroms was calculated for all biotin-avidin pairs and approximately 1 to 3 angstroms for the actin monomer-monomer interaction. A model for the correlation among binding forces, intermolecular potential, and molecular function is proposed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 4 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 218 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 28%
Researcher 46 19%
Professor 22 9%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 19%
Physics and Astronomy 44 18%
Chemistry 40 17%
Engineering 29 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 35 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2026.
All research outputs
#3,666,975
of 33,660,302 outputs
Outputs from Science
#37,898
of 93,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,620
of 30,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#47
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,660,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.