Sampling bias in climate–conflict research

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, February 2018

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 8 news outlets
blogs: 3 blogs
policy: 13 policy sources
twitter: 46 X users

facebook: 4 Facebook pages
wikipedia: 3 Wikipedia pages
reddit: 2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley: 333 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 47 X posts from 46 X users, with an upper bound of 308,018 followers.

@mike_mulberry @LawyersAreResp YOU refuse to take in information. Why don't read real science instead of pseudo science? https://t.co/HTO3AICIcD https://t.co/mlHDu5byKh

https://t.co/ScEbOXcF1a Research examining the effects of #climate change on conflicts examines only a few regions where violence is already prevalent. This implies they may not be focusing on the areas most #vulnerable to #climate change.

@mkeulemans @rjtklein @GCAdaptation @Clingendaelorg Maarten, ik heb onder meer Adams et al 2018 gelezen: https://t.co/l4N7rmtsWm Zij zeggen NIET dat er "geen verband" is. Wel menen zij dat de methodologie van eerdere studies gebrekkig is. Overigens is A…

@IcaroLuca @ExtinctionR The laughable Syria/climate change claim has been debunked long ago. https://t.co/Z2quEV21fj

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 43 additional X posts.