↓ Skip to main content

Mobile task management tool that improves workflow of an acute general surgical service

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mobile task management tool that improves workflow of an acute general surgical service
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, February 2015
DOI 10.1111/ans.12988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Foo, Rod McDonald, Earle Savage, Richard Floyd, Anthony Butler, Alistair Rumball-Smith, Saxon Connor

Abstract

Understanding and being able to measure constraints within a health system is crucial if outcomes are to be improved. Current systems lack the ability to capture decision making with regard to tasks performed within a patient journey. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a mobile task management tool on clinical workflow within an acute general surgical service by analysing data capture and usability of the application tool.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Engineering 7 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#24,786,738
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#1,947
of 3,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,307
of 409,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#14
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.