↓ Skip to main content

Serious adverse reactions to protamine sulfate: Are alternatives needed?

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, February 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
11 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Serious adverse reactions to protamine sulfate: Are alternatives needed?
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, February 1985
DOI 10.1016/0091-6749(85)90061-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Protamine sulfate is a strongly cationic polypeptide that is used commonly in clinical medicine. It is administered regularly after cardiac catheterization, cardiothoracic and vascular surgical procedures, and less frequently after dialysis and leukapheresis because of its capacity to reverse the anticoagulant activity of heparin. In addition, because it delays the absorption of insulin, protamine is combined with insulin in protamine zinc insulin and neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. Recently, there have been reports of adverse reactions to protamine (Table I). Although most of these reactions were relatively mild, three were fatal; one was clearly the result of type I anaphylaxis. Reactions occur predominantly in patients who were previously exposed to protamine through protamine-containing insulins or during heparin neutralization. Almost 50% of these patients were diabetic; most of whom received neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin, thereby enhancing their chance for presensitization. In 1983 we encountered three patients who suffered adverse reactions to protamine sulfate. Two of these patients will be presented here; the third patient, who died of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, has already been reported and therefore is mentioned only briefly. We shall discuss adverse reactions to protamine sulfate and alternatives to the routine use of this drug.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Chemistry 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2025.
All research outputs
#7,591,124
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#6,521
of 14,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,526
of 52,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.