You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Density estimation in a wolverine population using spatial capture–recapture models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.79 |
| Authors |
J. Andrew Royle, Audrey J. Magoun, Beth Gardner, Patrick Valkenburg, Richard E. Lowell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 304 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 21% |
| Researcher | 69 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 185 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 79 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,587,406
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#2,042
of 2,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,465
of 110,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#26
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.