↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic Targeting of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Molecular Medicine, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Therapeutic Targeting of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer
Published in
Trends in Molecular Medicine, February 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) represent a significant population of the human transcriptome. Many lncRNAs exhibit cell- and/or tissue/tumor-specific expression, making them excellent candidates for therapeutic applications. In this review we discuss examples of lncRNAs that demonstrate the diversity of their function in various cancer types. We also discuss recent advances in nucleic acid drug development with a focus on oligonucleotide-based therapies as a novel approach to inhibit tumor progression. The increased success rates of nucleic acid therapeutics provide an outstanding opportunity to explore lncRNAs as viable therapeutic targets to combat various aspects of cancer progression.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 420 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 17%
Researcher 56 13%
Student > Master 44 10%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Other 14 3%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 142 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 163 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 5%
Chemistry 10 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 157 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,479,587
of 34,139,555 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Molecular Medicine
#134
of 2,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,871
of 499,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Molecular Medicine
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,139,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.