↓ Skip to main content

Association of strategic management with vaccination in the terms of globalization

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Quality in Health Care, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of strategic management with vaccination in the terms of globalization
Published in
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, February 2018
DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzy002
Pubmed ID
Authors

MIHAJLO RABRENOVIC, MARIJA CUKANOVIC KARAVIDIC, IVANA STOSIC

Abstract

Globalization is having an ever growing impact on the field of vaccine production and distribution in the world and domestically. In this article we examine the impact of taking a strategic approach to vaccination programmes by all the relevant actors: WHO, UNICEF, national immunization programmes, and vaccine manufacturers and distributors. The review of the relevant literature indicates that there are commonalities to the worldwide vaccination programmes. A comparative analysis of various vaccination strategies recommended by WHO and the immunization calendars of certain European countriesis made as well as an analysis of the Serbian vaccination programme. New and more expensive vaccines will continue to appear on the market in increasingly short periods of time.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 26%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Computer Science 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,808,859
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#564
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,101
of 446,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#25
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.