Recent New Zealand guidelines recommend annual glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements from three months postpartum, replacing the glucose tolerance test (GTT) at six weeks, to screen for persistent hyperglycaemia following gestational diabetes. Data suggest that this screening approach may miss cases of type 2 diabetes, but are they detected at subsequent screening and will screening rates improve?
Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of HbA1c monitoring in improving screening rates following gestational diabetes and in detecting postpartum hyperglycaemia.
During 2015 in Christchurch, all women with gestational diabetes were offered HbA1c and GTT measurements at three months postpartum and subsequent annual HbA1c measurements were recommended. Data from electronic hospital records were collected for a minimum 18 months postpartum.
Of the cohort of 333 women, 218 (65%) completed both HbA1c and GTT at three months postpartum, 74 (22%) HbA1c only, 16 (5%) GTT only, 25 (8%) no screening; 184 (55%) had subsequent HbA1c tests. Diabetes was detected by GTT in five (2%) women and by HbA1c in only one out of five (20%); the disagreement between tests resolved in three out of four (75%) women with subsequent testing. Prediabetes was detected by GTT in 30 (14%) women; however, HbA1c only detected five out of 30 (17%) and subsequent HbA1c testing identified a further two out of 30 with prediabetes.
HbA1c measurement at three months postpartum had a good uptake. However, most cases of diabetes were identified by subsequent HbA1c testing, the uptake of which was suboptimal. The importance of annual HbA1c monitoring following gestational diabetes needs greater emphasis.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#28,747,540
of 34,518,599 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#1,649
of 1,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#387,082
of 485,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,599 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
