↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Obesity and steatosis promotes mitochondrial remodeling that enhances respiratory capacity in the liver of ob/ob mice
Published in
Febs Letters, February 2018
DOI 10.1002/1873-3468.13005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerome Garcia, Carl W. Decker, Silvestre J. Sanchez, Jeffrey M. Ouk, Krysta M. Siu, Derick Han

Abstract

We investigated if obesity/steatosis promotes mitochondrial remodeling in the liver of ob/ob mice (an obesity model). Liver mitochondria from ob/ob mice (21 weeks with significant steatosis) has ~2-fold increases in state III respiration compared to control (C57BL/6J, C57BL/6NJ) for all respiratory substrates examined (glutamate/malate, succinate, octanoate, and glycerol 3-phosphate). A corresponding 2-fold increase in the expression of respiratory complexes (I, IV, and V) and other respiratory proteins (glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase-2 and medium-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase) occur in liver mitochondria of mature ob/ob mice. Conversely, respiration in liver mitochondria from young ob/ob mice (6 weeks) do not differ from control with any respiratory substrates examined. Overall, mitochondrial remodeling that enhances respiration increases with obesity/steatosis in the liver of ob/ob mice. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 29%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#11,825,413
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Febs Letters
#7,839
of 17,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,469
of 372,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Febs Letters
#38
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.