↓ Skip to main content

Negative Aging Stereotypes Disrupt both the Selection and Execution of Strategies in Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Gerontology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Negative Aging Stereotypes Disrupt both the Selection and Execution of Strategies in Older Adults
Published in
Gerontology, February 2018
DOI 10.1159/000486756
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Age-based cognitive deficits are exacerbated by stereotype threat effects (i.e., the threat of being judged as cognitively incapable due to aging). We tested whether age-based stereotype threat effects can occur via impair- ing older adults' ability to select the best strategy and/or to execute strategies efficiently. Older adults (age range: 64.3-89.5 years) were randomly assigned to a stereotype threat or control condition before taking an episodic memory task. They encoded pairs of concrete words and of abstract words, with either a repetition or an imagery strategy, and then took a cued-recall task. Whereas participants in experiment 1 could choose between these two strategies, those of experiment 2 were forced to use either the repetition or the imagery strategy. Our findings showed that age-based stereotype threat disrupts both the selection and execution of the most efficient, but also most resource-demanding, imagery strategy, and that these stereotype threat effects were stronger on concrete words. Our findings have important implications to further understand age-based (and other) stereotype threat effects, and how noncognitive factors modulate age-related changes in human cognition.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 18 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 51%