You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining landscapes suitable for restoration of grizzly bears Ursus arctos in Idaho
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, February 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0006-3207(98)00057-3 |
| Authors |
Troy Merrill, David J Mattson, R.Gerald Wright, Howard B Quigley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 229 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 58 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 145 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 65 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,074
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,642
of 102,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.