↓ Skip to main content

Reproductive Cancer Treatment Hospitalizations of U.S. Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reproductive Cancer Treatment Hospitalizations of U.S. Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Published in
Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, February 2018
DOI 10.1352/1934-9556-56.1.1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is a dearth of existing research on the treatment of reproductive cancers among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). This study analyzed the 2010 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample and compared the prevalence of reproductive cancer treatment hospitalization discharges among women with and without IDD. Discharges linked to women with IDD had higher incidences of cancer of the uterus and lower prevalence of cancer of the cervix. Moreover, discharges linked to women with IDD indicated these women were younger, had longer hospital stays, and were more likely to have public insurance coverage. Therefore, further research and targeted interventions to increase cancer prevention and screening are urgently needed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 23 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Psychology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 26 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2018.
All research outputs
#27,710,064
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
#284
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#377,404
of 492,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.