↓ Skip to main content

Morphological differences between Saturn's ultraviolet aurorae and those of Earth and Jupiter

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
359 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Morphological differences between Saturn's ultraviolet aurorae and those of Earth and Jupiter
Published in
Nature, February 2005
DOI 10.1038/nature03331
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It has often been stated that Saturn's magnetosphere and aurorae are intermediate between those of Earth, where the dominant processes are solar wind driven, and those of Jupiter, where processes are driven by a large source of internal plasma. But this view is based on information about Saturn that is far inferior to what is now available. Here we report ultraviolet images of Saturn, which, when combined with simultaneous Cassini measurements of the solar wind and Saturn kilometric radio emission, demonstrate that its aurorae differ morphologically from those of both Earth and Jupiter. Saturn's auroral emissions vary slowly; some features appear in partial corotation whereas others are fixed to the solar wind direction; the auroral oval shifts quickly in latitude; and the aurora is often not centred on the magnetic pole nor closed on itself. In response to a large increase in solar wind dynamic pressure Saturn's aurora brightened dramatically, the brightest auroral emissions moved to higher latitudes, and the dawn side polar regions were filled with intense emissions. The brightening is reminiscent of terrestrial aurorae, but the other two variations are not. Rather than being intermediate between the Earth and Jupiter, Saturn's auroral emissions behave fundamentally differently from those at the other planets.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 336 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 31%
Researcher 76 21%
Student > Master 32 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 5%
Student > Bachelor 15 4%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 59 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 149 42%
Engineering 91 25%
Materials Science 19 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Chemistry 7 2%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 63 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,487,737
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,494
of 91,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,611
of 141,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#249
of 370 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 370 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.