↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Zirconium Metal–Organic Frameworks Assembled from Pd and Pt PNNNP Pincer Complexes: Synthesis, Postsynthetic Modification, and Lewis Acid Catalysis
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, February 2018
DOI 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b03063
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Carboxylic acid-functionalized Pd and Pt PNNNP pincer complexes were used for the assembly of two porous Zr metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), 2-PdX and 2-PtX. Powder X-ray diffraction analysis shows that the new MOFs adopt cubic framework structures similar to the previously reported Zr6O4(OH)4[(POCOP)PdX]3, [POCOP = 2,6-(OPAr2)2C6H3); Ar = p-C6H4CO2-, X = Cl-, I-] (1-PdX). Elemental analysis and spectroscopic characterization indicate the presence of missing linker defects, and 2-PdX and 2-PtX were formulated as Zr6O4(OH)4(OAc)2.4[M(PNNNP)X]2.4[M = Pd, Pt; PNNNP = 2,6-(HNPAr2)2C5H3N; Ar = p-C6H4CO2-; X = Cl-, I-]. Postsynthetic halide ligand exchange reactions were carried out by treating 2-PdX with Ag(O3SCF3) or NaI followed by PhI(O2CCF3)2. The latter strategy proved to be more effective at activating the MOF for the catalytic intramolecular hydroamination of an o-substituted alkynyl aniline, underscoring the advantage of using halide exchange reagents that produce soluble byproducts.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 34 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 17 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#9,504,550
of 27,735,993 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#6,186
of 25,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,068
of 463,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#71
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,735,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.