↓ Skip to main content

Social, obstetric and environmental determinants of low Apgar score among infants born in four selected hospitals in Ibadan, Nigeria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Social, obstetric and environmental determinants of low Apgar score among infants born in four selected hospitals in Ibadan, Nigeria
Published in
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, February 2018
DOI 10.1080/01443615.2017.1367764
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Little information exists about socio-economic, environmental or occupational determinants of low Apgar scores among Nigerian neonates. Mothers in lying-in wards of four hospitals in Ibadan were interviewed on socio-demographic characteristics, obstetric history and work activities during index pregnancy. Apgar scores and clinical data were extracted from case notes. Of the 1349 respondents, 20% had Apgar score <7 at one minute, 4% at five minutes. Lower education, cooking with kerosene, physical exertion at work, nulliparity, hypertension in pregnancy, prolonged rupture of membranes, breech presentation and caesarean section were predictors for low Apgar scores at one minute; nulliparity, male infant and breech presentation at five minutes. Occupations with lower socio-economic status or those requiring physical exertion; tailoring, catering and hairdressing recorded higher rates of low Apgar scores at one minute (p = .08). Physical exertion at work and cooking with kerosene may be predictive of low Apgar scores and require further study.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2018.
All research outputs
#28,754,119
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#1,372
of 1,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#395,058
of 493,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#30
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.