↓ Skip to main content

Fragment Screening and Druggability Assessment for the CBP/p300 KIX Domain through Protein‐Observed 19F NMR Spectroscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fragment Screening and Druggability Assessment for the CBP/p300 KIX Domain through Protein‐Observed 19F NMR Spectroscopy
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/anie.201411658
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

(19) F NMR spectroscopy of labeled proteins is a sensitive method for characterizing structure, conformational dynamics, higher-order assembly, and ligand binding. Fluorination of aromatic side chains has been suggested as a labeling strategy for small-molecule ligand discovery for protein-protein interaction interfaces. Using a model transcription factor binding domain of the CREB binding protein (CBP)/p300, KIX, we report the first full small-molecule screen using protein-observed (19) F NMR spectroscopy. Screening of 508 compounds and validation by (1) H-(15) N HSQC NMR spectroscopy led to the identification of a minimal pharmacaphore for the MLL-KIX interaction site. Hit rate analysis for the CREB-KIX and MLL-KIX sites provided a metric to assess the ligandability or "druggability" of each interface informing future medicinal chemistry efforts. The structural information from the simplified spectra and data collection speed, affords a new screening tool for analysis of protein interfaces and discovery of small molecules.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 32 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Computer Science 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,453,517
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#18,976
of 61,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,793
of 410,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#268
of 693 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 693 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.