↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Survey of Bloodstream Infections Due to Gram-Negative Bacilli: Frequency of Occurrence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Isolates Collected in the United States,Canada, and Latin America for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, September 1999
DOI 10.1086/598640
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

During 1997, a total of 4,267 nosocomial and community-acquired bloodstream infections due to gram-negative organisms were reported from SENTRY hospitals in Canada (8 sites), the United States (30 sites), and Latin America (10 sites). Escherichia coli was the most common isolate (41% of all gram-negative isolates), followed by Klebsiella species (17.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.6%), and Enterobacter species (9.4%). For all gram-negative isolates combined, the most active antimicrobials tested were meropenem, imipenem, and cefepime. The quinolones levofloxacin (MIC90, 2 microg/mL), ciprofloxacin (MIC90, 1 microg/mL), gatifloxacin (MIC90, 2 microg/mL), sparfloxacin (MIC90, 2 microg/mL), and trovafloxacin (MIC90, 2 microg/mL) were also active against most isolates. Bloodstream infection isolates from Latin America were uniformly more resistant to all classes of antimicrobial agents tested than were isolates from Canada or the United States. Resistance phenotypes consistent with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production were also most common among E. coli and Klebsiella species from Latin America. Further investigation of the reasons for regional differences in resistance patterns is needed, as is ongoing surveillance to detect resistance trends and to guide antimicrobial use.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Chemistry 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2024.
All research outputs
#4,992,798
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#8,023
of 20,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,875
of 50,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#15
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.