↓ Skip to main content

Luminescent Properties of a Water‐Soluble Conjugated Polymer Incorporating Graphene‐Oxide Quantum Dots

Overview of attention for article published in ChemPhysChem, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Luminescent Properties of a Water‐Soluble Conjugated Polymer Incorporating Graphene‐Oxide Quantum Dots
Published in
ChemPhysChem, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/cphc.201402744
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report the incorporation of graphene-oxide quantum dots (GOQDs) into films, diluted solutions, and light-emitting diodes (LEDs) as part of a water-soluble derivative of poly(p-phenylene vinylene), or PDV.Li, to investigate their impact on the light-emission properties of this model conjugated polymer. Despite the well-known ability of graphene and graphene oxide to quench the photoluminescence of nearby emitters, we find that the addition of GOQDs to diluted solutions of PDV.Li does not significantly affect the photoluminescence (PL) dynamics of PDV.Li, bringing about only a modest quenching of the PL. However, loading the polymer with GOQDs led to a substantial decrease in the turn-on voltage of LEDs based on GOQD-PDV.Li composites. This effect can be attributed to either the improved morphology of the host polymer, resulting in an increase in the charge mobility, or the enhanced injection through GOQDs near the electrodes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Master 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 27%
Materials Science 5 19%
Physics and Astronomy 3 12%
Engineering 3 12%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2015.
All research outputs
#19,869,877
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from ChemPhysChem
#2,889
of 5,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,109
of 361,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemPhysChem
#46
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.