↓ Skip to main content

Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Participants' Perceptions and Understanding of the Affordable Care Act

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Participants' Perceptions and Understanding of the Affordable Care Act
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, February 2015
DOI 10.1200/jco.2014.58.0993
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) established provisions intended to increase access to affordable health insurance and thus increase access to medical care and long-term surveillance for populations with pre-existing conditions. However, childhood cancer survivors' coverage priorities and familiarity with the ACA are unknown.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Psychology 5 10%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,423,833
of 34,344,963 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#6,817
of 32,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,623
of 408,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#88
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,344,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.