↓ Skip to main content

High temperature pyrolysis of 2-methyl furan

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP), January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High temperature pyrolysis of 2-methyl furan
Published in
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP), January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c7cp07775k
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The dissociation of 2-methyl furan at high temperatures has been studied in a combined experimental and theoretical approach to elucidate the details of this multi-channel unimolecular reaction. Laser schlieren densitometry studies were performed in a diaphragmless shock tube over the range 1600 < T < 2300 K and three pressures 60, 120 and 240 Torr. The theoretical study identified many reaction paths, most of which are initiated by the formation of carbenes. Of these paths, five account for 99% consumption of 2MF, and three account for 95% consumption. Simulations of the experimental results with a model that incorporated the theoretical predictions of reaction paths failed to reproduce the experimental data. This was resolved by increasing the rate of loss of an H-atom from the methyl group in 2-methyl furan by a factor of 2-4. The resulting model provides good simulations of the complete set of experimental data. The branching fractions for the three key reactions are both temperature and pressure dependent.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Researcher 5 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 3 16%
Chemistry 3 16%
Energy 2 11%
Engineering 2 11%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#28,615,159
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP)
#13,636
of 21,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#396,967
of 496,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP)
#921
of 1,850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.